Home   |   My Politico:    |   Feedback
Find stories by: Author 
 Or Date 
 Or Keywords 
   
Politico.com Logo - Click to return to home page     
 
Navigate:  Home   |  Politics '08  |  ‘Invasion of Georgia’ a ‘3 a.m. moment’
     Print      Comment      Email      Recommend           Speak To Power

‘Invasion of Georgia’ a ‘3 a.m. moment’

Text Size:   
John McCain
Bush, Obama statements reflect those of democratically elected world leaders, while McCain takes more aggressive approach.
Photo: AP

When the North Caucasus slid into war Thursday night, it presented John McCain and Barack Obama with a true “3 a.m. moment,” and their responses to the crisis suggested dramatic differences in how each candidate, as president, would lead America in moments of international crisis.

While Obama offered a response largely in line with statements issued by democratically elected world leaders, including President Bush, first calling on both sides to negotiate, John McCain took a remarkably — and uniquely — more aggressive stance, siding clearly with Georgia’s pro-Western leaders and placing the blame for the conflict entirely on Russia.

The abrupt crisis in an obscure hotspot had the features of the real foreign policy situations presidents face — not the clean hypotheticals of candidates’ white papers and debating points.

Russia has long attempted to reclaim now-sovereign parts of the former Soviet Union, stoking conflicts in the enclaves of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which are universally recognized to be Georgian soil. Russia has also used the ensuing military tensions to set back Georgia’s bid to enter NATO.

But Georgia appears to have sparked the conflict by marching on the South Ossetian capital as Russia’s powerful Prime Minister Vladimir Putin headed to Beijing for the Olympic Games. Russia, in turn, welcomed the conflict, launching a large-scale attack on its smaller neighbor and sending tanks across its border.

Both American candidates back Georgia’s sovereignty and its turn toward the West. But their first statements on the crisis revealed differences of substance and style. 

Obama’s statement put him in line with the White House, the European Union, NATO and a series of European powers, while McCain’s initial statement — which he delivered in Iowa and ran on a blog on his Web site under the title “McCain Statement on Russian Invasion of Georgia” — put him more closely in line with the moral clarity and American exceptionalism projected by President Bush’s first term.

A McCain adviser suggested that Obama’s statement constituted appeasement, while Obama’s camp suggested that McCain was being needlessly belligerent and dangerously quick to judge a complicated situation.

“I strongly condemn the outbreak of violence in Georgia, and urge an immediate end to armed conflict,” Obama said in a written statement. “Now is the time for Georgia and Russia to show restraint and to avoid an escalation to full-scale war. Georgia’s territorial integrity must be respected.”

Obama added briefly that the international community should get involved. More than an hour later, as more details of Russia’s incursion into Georgia emerged, he cited Russia more directly: “What is clear is that Russia has invaded Georgia’s sovereign — has encroached on Georgia’s sovereignty,” he told reporters in Sacramento.

McCain’s statement was longer, more detailed and more confrontational.

"[T]he news reports indicate that Russian military forces crossed an internationally recognized border into the sovereign territory of Georgia. Russia should immediately and unconditionally cease its military operations and withdraw all forces from sovereign Georgian territory.

“The government of Georgia has called for a ceasefire and for a resumption of direct talks on South Ossetia with international mediators. The U.S. should immediately work with the EU and the OSCE to put diplomatic pressure on Russia to reverse this perilous course that it has chosen.”

Next Page >>
Read more stories in Politics '08.
Get alerted everytime your favorite reporter posts a story
Like this story? Buzz it up on Yahoo! Buzz
Most Emailed News Stories
JOIN THE CONVERSATION (read all 753 comments)
POST
Replies: 753      
default avatar for user Tamsin Crozier
Party: NA
Reply #1
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:12 AM EST

TeamPolitico: Aug. 9, 2008 - 7:51 AM EST

John McCain took a remarkably—and uniquely—more aggressive stance,

McCain is a trigger-happy war-monger. He thinks we should still be fighting in Vietnam, despite the fact that Vietnam is now our trading partner and a popular American tourist destination. He sings "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran," causing oil speculators to bid up the price of oil. He disdains diplomacy, calling it "appeasement," he wants to kick Russia out of the G8, and he is pushing for missile bases on Russia's doorstep which has angered Russia so much Russia has restarted nuclear bomber patrols to Guam and Scotland and even threatens to place Russian bombers in Cuba. It's clear that McCain the old war-horse is trying to re-start the Cold War and make sure it's very hot this time. In his case this behavior may be hereditary: his father, the Admiral, never wanted to stop bombing Vietnam and his grandfather, also the Admiral, was so depressed when WW II ended that he said he didn't know what to do with himself and promptly died.

ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
default avatar for user jude
Party: N/A
Reply #2
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:27 AM EST

That's the trouble with McCain - he's a hothead, he doesn't think things out he just reacts. It's not even his country that is in question and he spouts off like a warmonger. He is a scary white-haired-dude.
ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
default avatar for user carleton
Party: NA
Reply #3
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:31 AM EST

Tamsin Crozier: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:12 AM EST

He thinks we should still be fighting in Vietnam

No he doesn't, he's gone there numerous times and his wife does charity work there. Learn about McCain before lying about him.

Tamsin Crozier: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:12 AM EST

In his case this behavior may be hereditary: his father, the Admiral, never wanted to stop bombing Vietnam and his grandfather, also the Admiral, was so depressed when WW II ended that he said he didn't know what to do with himself and promptly died.

Your bias and ignorance is apparent, we get it. No need to go further.

Getting that out of the way, he is reckless with foreign policy; one of the main reasons I will not vote for him. On the other hand, Obama has a razor-thin resume and no accomplishments to speak of, so we'll be stuck in a mess for a while with one of these two cut-ups.

ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
default avatar for user XTeam
Party: Independent
Reply #4
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:32 AM EST

Tamsin - Couldn't disagree with you more. His "off the cuff" singing of Bomb-bomb Iran had nothing to do with oil prices - very convenient lie. Russia has been acting very much like the Soviet Union of old, and that is why some European nations welcome a missile defense. With regard to the rest of your statement, to place some genetic marker making a family "pro-war", is simply beyond the pale. What McCain represents is strength, versus this "let's talk and sing kumbaya" thought process espoused by the empty suit messiah BHO. McCain is calling Russia to the carpet on this one, and it's nice to see. IF Russia continues to be an aggressor on other nations sovereignty, they SHOULD be removed from the G8. In the end, nobody wants war. Except it would seem, for the Russians.
"Without Freedom of Thought there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as Public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech." Benjamin Franklin"
ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
avatar for user ncindy
Party: Independent
Reply #5
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:39 AM EST

I think both of the comments are close to the same. It is more important as to what they would do next. Obama is clearly on vacation when the 3AM call came and should stay there not to be seen or heard. There is no need for comment from either. President Bush is out president and this conflict will not last long. The United States should not run to everybodies defense and think twice about who they pick up as allies.

ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
avatar for user America08
Party: Independent
Reply #6
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:42 AM EST

McCain is a HOT HEAD!

We need an even, tempered and wise President who will not act like we are the World Police.

Vote NO 2 MCCAIN.


No more red, republican BLOOD Kool-Aid for me. It's all about the grape Kool-Aid now. "Factor O". Flavor CHANGE IS soooo SWEET!
ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
avatar for user Jinks
Party: Independent
Reply #7
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:46 AM EST

For all of you kiddies out there pick up a world history book turn to Russia pre WWII and read about Stalin. Once you have become informed you can comment on this blog.

ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
avatar for user mathias1
Party: Independent
Reply #8
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:50 AM EST

America08: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:42 AM EST

McCain is a HOT HEAD!

We need an even, tempered and wise President who will not act like we are the World Police.

Vote NO 2 MCCAIN.

A "3AM Moment" and Obama is on vacation, LOL.

I guess the Obama World Tour, with 3 or 4 stage performances a day, has worn the little phony out.

Let the real politicians handle the real issues. Let the fraud drink margaritas on the beach.


ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THOSE PUPPET STRINGS ATTACHED TO OBAMA'S ARMS AND LEGS??
ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
avatar for user dcvoter
Party: Democrat
Reply #9
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 8:59 AM EST

John McCain is a warmonger. The appearance of a conflict of interest puts it mildly. The Eastern European missile defense program is antagonistic and needs to be done away with. McCain is scarier than Bush. We need to focus more attention on domestic issues. We should not be policing the world.
"We need to win. America needs us to win"
ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
avatar for user mathias1
Party: Independent
Reply #10
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 9:00 AM EST

“McCain took an inflexible approach to addressing this issue by focusing heavily on one side, without a pragmatic assessment of the situation,” said Mark Brzezinski, a former Clinton White House official and an informal advisor to Obama. “It’s both side’s fault—both have been somewhat provocative with each other,” he said.

Uh...didn't RUSSIA invade GEORGIA? Obama's political tools can argue who started what, but the fact is, RUSSIA is the invader.

Would Hillary have been as impossibly weak as Obama? Dems really messed up supporting this phony.


ANYONE ELSE NOTICE THOSE PUPPET STRINGS ATTACHED TO OBAMA'S ARMS AND LEGS??
ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
default avatar for user Katherine80
Party: NA
Reply #11
Date: Aug. 9, 2008 - 9:00 AM EST

McCain sided with a Western ally--a smart thing to do. Russia has invaded a sovereign nation, folks. Obama just went along with whatever else was ALREADY said. He did this through his entire campaign with Hillary. He just adopted her ideas. He's still doing it by talking about increasing troops in Afghanistan--that was in Hillary's victory speech in Ohio. Give me a break this guy wouldn't know what to do in a "3 a.m." moment. McCain 08
ReplyReply     QuoteQuote     Report AbuseReport Abuse
avatar for user mathias1